This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] MIPS/Linux: Let one select the default ABI for 64-bit

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: cgd at broadcom dot com
Cc: macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 21 May 2003 12:05:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] MIPS/Linux: Let one select the default ABI for 64-bit
Organization:
References: <yov51xytmfpv.fsf@broadcom.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030521130532.2088G-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1053515901.5125@news-sj1-1> <yov565o4up74.fsf@broadcom.com>

On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 11:31, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> At Wed, 21 May 2003 11:18:21 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> >  Well, admittedly, "mips64" as an alias for n32 is a wacked-out name for
> > me.  I would assume <CPU>64 means full support for a <CPU> in it's 64-bit
> > mode.  The (n)64 ABI fullfills it, but the n32 one doesn't as it's support
> > for 64 bits is partial from the binutils' POV and minimal from the gcc's
> > one.
> 
> Uh, n32 support should either be complete in binutils right now, or
> should be "shortly."
> 
> Right Alex?  8-)

Heck, I'll answer this: it should all work. Because I'll have to do
anything he hasn't already done. :)

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- Re: [patch] MIPS/Linux: Let one select the default ABI for64-bit
  - From: cgd
- Re: [patch] MIPS/Linux: Let one select the default ABI for 64-bit
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [patch] MIPS/Linux: Let one select the default ABI for64-bit
  - From: cgd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]