This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: undefined virtual table references in 2.12 and later
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- To: "Donald Zoch" <donald dot zoch at amd dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 28 May 2003 11:56:25 -0700
- Subject: Re: undefined virtual table references in 2.12 and later
- References: <20030528134335.C2266@lard.amd.com>
"Donald Zoch" <donald.zoch@amd.com> writes:
> >From what I can tell though, in my libgcc.a (I'm using gcc 2.95.3),
> the symbols are defined as weak objects, but then undefined several
> times also:
>
> 00000000 V bad_exception virtual table
> 00000000 V exception virtual table
> U exception virtual table
> U exception virtual table
> U exception virtual table
Note that several different symbol names can be demangled into
``... virtual table''. You should double check the real symbol names,
to make sure this isn't some sort of weird situation in which
different mangling is being used in different places.
nm demangles by default; the --no-demangle option turns it off.
Ian