This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: importing another file into top-level include directory?
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: zack at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:38:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: importing another file into top-level include directory?
- References: <200306231029.47712.bwilson@tensilica.com><200306231742.h5NHgIU02837@greed.delorie.com><200306231053.38779.bwilson@tensilica.com><200306231758.h5NHwg203175@greed.delorie.com> <87r85kd51u.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
> This discussion reminds me that I'd like to import include/filenames.h
> into the gcc CVS. It would replace a bunch of xm-*.h gunk. That file
> is listed as "part of BFD, the Binary File Descriptor library" -- does
> that raise any issues? I don't anticipate needing to make any changes
> to the file; gcc already uses all the same macro names.
I think people have suggested this before, and it's just waiting for
someone to actually do the work. However, given all the recent talk
about libiberty copyright notices, I don't know what to do about that
part.