This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations


On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:13:30PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:46:42PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:21:50PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:16:12PM -0700, Bob Wilson wrote:
> > > > Right.  We always set -fpic for Xtensa/Linux.
> > > 
> > > Ah, ok.  In which case you shouldn't have any problems.
> > > I've already committed the patch (with ia64 fixed), so
> > > you should just do the s/0/1/ and update the commentary.
> > > 
> > 
> > I got so many "make check" failures like
> > 
> > /export/build/linux/binutils-debug/build-i686-linux/ld/ld-new:
> > /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x1d): unresolvable relocation against symbol
> > `__libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.0'
> > FAIL: bootstrap
> > 
> > on RedHat 9. Did "make check" work for you on RedHat 9?
> > 
> > 
> 
> I checked in the following patch to fix it.
> 
> 

Linux/ia64 is still broken. I got

+FAIL: bootstrap with --static
+FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak)
+FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
+FAIL: visibility (protected_weak)
+FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main)
+FAIL: common hidden symbol
+FAIL: weak hidden symbol DSO first
+FAIL: undefined
+FAIL: undefined function
+FAIL: undefined line
+FAIL: weak undefined symbols

from "make check" in ld on RedHat AS 2.1.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]