This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations


On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 08:26:43AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Weak defined symbols are purely for link time and only meaningful for
> relocatable inputs.

Hmm, OK.  Seems a little odd that we make weak undef dynamic then.

I'm going to install my patch so that x86 and ppc work again.  It's
likely that ia64 could use _bfd_elf_symbol_refs_local_p instead of
_bfd_elf_dynamic_symbol_p, but I don't really have the time right
now to figure out what needs doing.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]