This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] new sh relocs

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: ian at airs dot com
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:38:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] new sh relocs
References: <200308152051.h7FKp5b14273@greed.delorie.com> <m3k79e41t2.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

> But, but, isn't moving relocs going to break existing object files?

Sad but true.  At least it's only objects built with relax on.
Renesas noted such incompatibility in their request to us.

Note that there are a lot of other relocs that may need to be moved
later, too.  The ones I'm moving now are the ones that conflict with
relocs their compiler currently uses.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] new sh relocs
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- [patch] new sh relocs
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [patch] new sh relocs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]