This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Re: An undefined typed symbol bug?
"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:42:26PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > I got
> >
> > # make
> > cc -c -o x.o x.c
> > as -o y.o y.s
> > ld -r -o foo.o x.o y.o
> > ld -r -o foo.o y.o x.o
> > ld: Warning: type of symbol `foo' changed from 1 to 2 in x.o
> >
> > y.o has an undefined typed symbol, foo. Depending on if the linker
> > sees the definition first, ld may issue a warning. I'd like to get
> > rid of the warning. Any comments?
> >
>
> How about this patch?
Seems OK to me. We might be hiding a programming error, but the error
won't make any difference in this particular case. Any other
opinions?
Ian