This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)


On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:16:14 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:12:40PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:

>> But Jason Merrill says
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00682.html
>> 
>> "I don't see why there would be a problem with the current
>> situation; only the right .debug_line info should match the current PC."
>> 
>> and in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00689.html
>> 
>> "... the relocs in the .debug_line info for the discarded copy should
>> resolve to 0.  That's how we deal with duplicate .debug_info ..."
>> 
>> And then he came with the test case
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00723.html
>> to show how that works - and it turned out not to work anymore
>> with binutils-2.14.90.
>> 
>> Is there any reason why this can't be changed back?
>
> Have you tried this using CVS binutils?
>
> Nick could not reproduce your problem.  It could be a patch in Rawhide,
> unlikely as that seems.

IIRC, I reproduced the bug with CVS binutils (of a month ago).

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]