This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)


On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:24:14PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Now use a different 'ld' (I have PATH=.: ...)
> 
> /usr/src/GNU/gcc/PR9509/jasons.test>ln -sf /usr/src/GNU/binutils/src/build-i386-redhat-linux/ld/.libs/ld-new ld

Oh, note that two ld's use a different libbfd:

>ldd /usr/bin/ld
        libbfd-2.13.90.0.18.so => /usr/lib/libbfd-2.13.90.0.18.so (0x4002d000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4009f000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

>ldd ./ld
        libbfd-2.14.90.so => /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.so (0x4002d000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

/usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.so is the installed libbfd from todays CVS.


So the bug is in either ld or libbfd.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]