This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- From: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:04:04 +0100
- Subject: Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- References: <m3k75ozdlx.fsf@redhat.com> <20031125172909.GA5919@lucon.org> <20031125220248.GA967@alinoe.com> <20031126010816.GA13067@lucon.org> <20031126021325.GA12151@alinoe.com> <20031126043049.GA4512@nevyn.them.org> <m37k1njmx4.fsf@redhat.com> <20031126153606.GA10847@nevyn.them.org> <m3oeuzhyu1.fsf@redhat.com> <20031126194452.GA18482@alinoe.com>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:44:52PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:35:50PM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > info as possible ? It seems that including this information is what
> > it causing the problem, and ideally what we ought to be doing is
> > discarding .gnu.linkonce sections containing debug info, rather than
> > retaining them.
>
> I'd be happy when the info is disgarded. Much better than
> assigning it the address of another function.
>
> Is it possible to do this instead, before 2.14 is released
> at large?
What is the status of this Problem Report?
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>