This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] New port m32r-linux target.

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Kazuhiro Inaoka <inaoka dot kazuhiro at renesas dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:32:27 +1030
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New port m32r-linux target.
References: <007901c3c55c$cc9229e0$2569910a@tool.maec.co.jp> <m37k0u2f37.fsf@redhat.com> <002f01c3c5fa$2c8f71c0$2569910a@tool.maec.co.jp>

Hi,
I noticed that m32r-elf is failing one of the binutils tests.
+FAIL: readelf -s

On looking at why, I see that m32r-elf-as is producing objects with
both .rel and .rela sections, eg.

[ 1] .text       PROGBITS  00000000 000034 000008 00  AX  0   0  1
[ 2] .rela.text  RELA      00000000 000324 00000c 0c      8   1  4
[ 3] .rel.text   REL       00000000 000330 000000 08      8   1  4

I think this is wrong.  It's a consequence of copying old mips code
(along with comments that aren't relevant for this target) to
m32r_elf_fake_sections.

Also, m32r-elf used to be a REL target.  Did you intend to change
m32r-elf to RELA when you added m32r-linux?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] New port m32r-linux target.
  - From: Kazuhiro Inaoka

References:
- [PATCH] New port m32r-linux target.
  - From: Kazuhiro Inaoka
- Re: [PATCH] New port m32r-linux target.
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH] New port m32r-linux target.
  - From: Kazuhiro Inaoka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]