This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [discuss] --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain? (was: building a cross-compiler is hard)

From: Raul Miller <moth at magenta dot com>
To: discuss at x86-64 dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:06:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [discuss] --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain? (was: building a cross-compiler is hard)
References: <3FFC8E2C.9010107@kegel.com> <20040107190305.S28449@links.magenta.com> <20040107192120.T28449@links.magenta.com> <3FFCA66D.1020703@google.com>

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:38:05PM -0800, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> BTW, why do you build glibc twice? 

I thought it was important at one point, but I forget why.

-- 
Raul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain? (was: building a cross-compiler is hard)
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain?(was: building a cross-compiler is hard)
  - From: Daniel Kegel
- Re: [discuss] --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain? (was: building a cross-compiler is hard)
  - From: Raul Miller
- Re: [discuss] --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain? (was: building a cross-compiler is hard)
  - From: Raul Miller
- Re: [discuss] --with-sysroot required when building 32->64 bit crosstoolchain?(was: building a cross-compiler is hard)
  - From: Daniel Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]