This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [wip:binutils] Large corefile support

jtc@acorntoolworks.com (J.T. Conklin) writes:

> If file_ptr is changed to be defined in terms of long/off_t/off64_t
> (depending on what's available on the host), it seems worthwhile to
> create a bfd_fseek() that wraps fseek/fseeko/fseeko64 (likewise for
> bfd_ftell() and ftell/ftello/ftello64) so that conditionals for each
> type are isolated in a single place.

Yes, I agree, and we already have bfd_seek and bfd_tell.  Nothing else
should call fseek or ftell on the FILE underlying a BFD.

Ian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]