This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: Failures on x86-64 expected?
- From: "Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com>
- To: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:30:07 -0000
- Subject: RE: Failures on x86-64 expected?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: 03 March 2004 16:08
> To: H. J. Lu
> Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: Failures on x86-64 expected?
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:07:04AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > That's weird, I get zero make check failures with today's CVS on
> > > IA-32 and only
> > > 4 (selective[1245]) failures on x86-64.
> > >
> >
> > Are those failures on x86-64 expected? Are they missing features in
> > linker?
>
> It has been failing for ages and I've never bothered to look
> what's up with it. I will tonight.
>
> Jakub
The selectiveN tests are checking for -gc-sections support. That's a
missing feature for quite a lot of targets, but I can't speak specifically
to whether it's expected to be missing for x86-64 or not....
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....