This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: telling symbols defined only in the linker script
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 03 Mar 2004 18:32:50 -0300
- Subject: Re: telling symbols defined only in the linker script
- Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
- References: <m3y8qiuqc1.fsf@redhat.com><20040303143028.GA12808@nevyn.them.org>
On Mar 3, 2004, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:23:26AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
>> > Index: bfd/ChangeLog
>> > from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
>> >
>> > * elflink.c (bfd_elf_record_link_assignment): Mark undefweak and
>> > undefined symbols as hash_new.
>>
>> Approved for mainline. Not sure about the branch though, since I am
>> concerned that this patch might introduce a subtle new bug that will
>> take some time to detect.
> I agree - too much ripple.
<aoliva>Me too</aoliva> :-)
I've checked the patch into mainline. I had actually considered
proposing it for the branch as well and discarded that possibility
because of the very risks Nick exposed. Sorry if I failed to expose
them in my post.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}