This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Short circuit bfd_map_over_sections

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:20:21 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: Short circuit bfd_map_over_sections
References: <20040430000133.GA27737@lucon.org> <m37jvycoi0.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20040430001811.GB28069@lucon.org>

> That is fine. What should we call it? bfd_run_over_sections,
> bfd_call_over_sections, bfd_call_on_sections, ...

I like call_on or call_over. If I had to choose I think I like call_on
more.

run_over sounds painful :)

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- RFC: Short circuit bfd_map_over_sections
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFC: Short circuit bfd_map_over_sections
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: RFC: Short circuit bfd_map_over_sections
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]