This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at act-europe dot fr>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION
References: <20040505133326.GS2565@bubble.modra.org> <200406151622.37233.ebotcazou@act-europe.fr><20040615142144.GJ21264@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200406151712.39413.ebotcazou@act-europe.fr><20040615142705.GZ5191@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Yes.  The KEEP and the .gcc_except_table.* were killed by your patch and we
> > need both.
>
> I had to apply the -z relro patch by hand and clearly I have missed your
> recent changes (well, I have missed it even in the mail you just posted).

Today's lecturing: It seems those recent changes didn't come
with a test-case and that's the lesson to learn.

brgds, H-P

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] -z relro + .dynsym STT_SECTION
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]