This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix broken .linkonce


On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 12:50:52PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 07:48:08AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:11:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>H.J.  Lu's 2004-05-11 change to subsegs.c caused .linkonce symbols to
> >>be treated as undeclared, at least for PE.
> >
> >Can you add a testcase for it?
> 
> Can I get confirmation that this is actually the right fix before we
> start talking about test cases?

I have used the new binutils to build gcc, glibc and kernel on Linux. I
don't have any problems. I am trying to understand why/how it is broken
on PE. A testcase will be very helpful.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]