This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add architecture information to disassembler tables

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:01:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add architecture information to disassembler tables
References: <200411271122.iARBMLlA029942@merlin.buzzard.freeserve.co.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0411280500440.90195@dair.pair.com><1101721816.1585.0.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:05, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> > For the record, opcode tables that are shared with the assembler
> > usually go in a file named opcodes/<target>-opc.c, ...

> These aren't shared with the assembler.

You sure fooled me with one of the first lines of the moved
tables in the patch (read: I claim I *did* reasonable checking):
+ /* Format of the assembler string :

>  So your point is?

Misleading or lack of comments about purpose of the tables? ;-)

brgds, H-P

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add architecture information to disassemblertables
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- [PATCH] ARM: Add architecture information to disassembler tables
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add architecture information to disassembler tables
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add architecture information to disassemblertables
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]