This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
.cfi_startproc simple
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich at novell dot com>
- To: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:35:12 +0100
- Subject: .cfi_startproc simple
Is it intentional that this directive inherits (rather than clears) the
previous procedure's exit state (namely cur_cfa_offset)? Even if the
expectation is that the user explicitly set the new frame information,
wouldn't it make sense to invalidate the old settings to catch and warn
about uses without setting the basic information? Thanks, Jan