This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [arm] Don't "adjust" EABI relocations
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:06:41 +0000
- Subject: Re: [arm] Don't "adjust" EABI relocations
- References: <200411301552.39145.paul@codesourcery.com> <20041130165930.GA19784@nevyn.them.org> <41ACA8FE.4020601@redhat.com> <200411301714.23443.paul@codesourcery.com> <41ACADA9.1060100@redhat.com> <1101835588.29185.9.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20041130174118.GA22074@nevyn.them.org>
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 17:41, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> It's the default nowadays, because every use is guarded by these two
> things: "the command line argument was not specified" and "the osabi is
> 0". We never produce objects with an OSABI of 0; we use ELF_OSABI_ARM
> (spelling?) instead, which is 'a'.
If we are still setting the OSABI field in EABI conforming objects, then
that is a bug.
R.