This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] x86: more Intel syntax work


>>> Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> 14.03.05 18:12:59 >>>
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> 2005-03-14  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>
>> 
>> 	* config/tc-i386.c (i386_scale): Beautify error message.
>> 	(Intel syntax comments): Update.
>> 	(struct intel_parser_s): Add fields in_offset, in_bracket, and
>> 	next_operand.
>> 	(intel_e04_1, intel_e05_1, intel_e05_1, intel_e09_1,
>> intel_e10_1):
>> 	Remove declarations.
>> [ ... ]
>>
>This looks basically OK.  Though I haven't touched this code in
>such a long time that I'm not sure I'm the best one qualified to
>review patches in this area.
>
>Perhaps it would be best if I relinquished maintainership of the
>Intel syntax.  Nick?

So how should I deal with this? Should I take this as approval? Should
I wait for something else to happen?

Thanks, Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]