This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Why is a hacked unwind-ia64.h/c part of binutils?
- From: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- To: "binutils at sources dot redhat dot com" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:59:16 -0500
- Subject: Why is a hacked unwind-ia64.h/c part of binutils?
Although I understand these files historically contain some generic unwind
definitions, would there be opposition to accepting a patch to arguably
more properly peel the generic portions out, and correspondingly enable
the specification of target specific unwind type sizes which may be more
appropriate for smaller targets, as opposed to presuming they need be
defined by the ia64's native word type sizes?
(and correspondingly enabled for GCC target ports as well)