This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: build failure for ia64 (due to -Werror)
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- Cc: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>,Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>,<binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:38:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: build failure for ia64 (due to -Werror)
- References: <BE623F8A.9880%schlie@comcast.net>
Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net> writes:
>> Andreas Schwab writes:
>>> James E Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com> writes:
>>>> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 17:23, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>> IMHO the only change we need is to check for BFD_HOST_64_BIT and error
>>>> out if that is not defined.
>>>
>>> Doesn't that break --enable-targets=all on a 32-bit host without long
>>> long?
>>
>> Yes, that is true. Although they are becoming rarer nowadays, and whether
>> it is worth to support this combination is another question.
>
> - Just to double check; 32-bit limited hosts would still be able to
> build/support correspondingly limited targets, yes?
Yes, sure. I'm not aware of anonther 32-bit backend that needs 64-bit
integers.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."