Re: uclibc patches

[Simon Richter <Simon dot Richter at hogyros dot de>]

Hi,

Peter S. Mazinger schrieb:

> > I'm not sure *-*-linux-uclibc would be the right choice, as it suggests
> > running Linux with uclibc as your C library, which is something the
> > binutils need not care about. I could, however, see a case for
> > *-*-uclinux due to the ABI differences and the need for relocation
> > information in fully linked executables.

> Maybe for binutils it does not make sense, but for gcc (libstdc++)
> it will be needed.

I think it may be much better to teach gcc how to switch its standard
libraries easily, possibly removing the fixincludes step from the
all-host target as a working gcc without system includes may be required
to bring the C library into a state where it can install its headers.

   Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature