This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
Cc: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,jakub at redhat dot com, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:45:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
References: <20050409224645.1d6f4a15.davem@davemloft.net><5460e333050410023148a98018@mail.gmail.com><20050410143510.2de68aeb.davem@davemloft.net><20050410170945.666d65d9.davem@davemloft.net><20050411005009.GY29412@bubble.modra.org><20050410181548.44df0d6e.davem@davemloft.net><20050411014926.GZ29412@bubble.modra.org>

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:19:26 +0930
Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> It might simply be that the two bss sections start at different
> addresses.  Perhaps they have different alignments for some reason.
> Perhaps a different start address is caused by pruning of unused
> sections in the ELF linker but not the SREC one.

That's a good guess.  The elf32-sparc BFD backend does garbage
collection.

I'll look more deeply into this.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: David S. Miller

References:
- [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: Christian Joensson
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]