This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64

From: Jerome Guitton <guitton at adacore dot com>
To: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:53:23 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64
References: <20050418190649.GA10768@adacore.com> <200504182113.j3ILDP3w023021@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050419161712.GA14005@adacore.com> <m3k6mys07k.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor (ian@airs.com):

> Because BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION was invented before AC_CHECK_DECL
> existed.

OK, thanks. Updated patch in attachment. OK to apply?

If I understand correctly, the calls to BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION are not
needed anymore.  I will replace them in a separate patch.

-- 
Jerome

Attachment: bfd_tru64.dif
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64
  - From: Jerome Guitton
- Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64
  - From: Jerome Guitton
- Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]