Re: 2.16.1 candidate patches

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:46:42PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2005 08:28 pm, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:15:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I've checked this in to HEAD and the 2.16 branch.  I don't know if
> > > there will be a binutils 2.16.1; if no other problems turn up in the
> > > next month or two, probably not.  But if there is, it will include ths
> > > fix.
> >
> > I'm putting http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00340.html
> > and http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00007.html plus
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00121.html on the
> > branch too.  The first one is important enough to roll 2.16.1 for
> > powerpc64 (or at least anyone using 2.16 and gcc-3.4 on powerpc64 will
> > want the patch).  I'm an idiot because I had a problem report in early
> > April but discounted it because I couldn't reproduce it, forgetting that
> > my local gcc-3.4 was patched to not use dot-syms.  The other two patches
> > just got forgotten but aren't critical in any way.
> 
> how about this little patch for ARM ?
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00146.html

I've merged that.  I'm going to wait until next week, and then create
2.16.1.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC