This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR 990: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:13:11 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR 990: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
References: <20050605183551.GA14837@lucon.org> <20050605195958.GA4116@lucon.org> <20050605215508.GA22303@lucon.org> <20050607031152.GK2677@bubble.grove.modra.org>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:41:52PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 02:55:09PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > 	* targets.c (BFD_JUMP_TABLE_SYMBOLS): Initialize _bfd_find_line
> > 	with _bfd_generic_find_line.
> > 	(bfd_target): Add _bfd_find_line.
> 
> You obviously didn't check this by compiling --enable-targets=all.
> 
> 	* coff-rs6000.c (rs6000coff_vec, pmac_xcoff_vec): Init _bfd_find_line.
> 	* coff64-rs6000.c (rs6000coff64_vec, aix5coff64_vec): Likewise.
> 

Sorry for that. You also need

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00108.html

Otherwise, "nm -l" will segfault on incomplete dwarf2 info.


H.J.

References:
- RFC: PR 990: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFC: PR 990: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
  - From: H. J. Lu
- PATCH: PR 990: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR 990: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]