This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR 1025: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619


On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 06:51:45AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 06:37:03AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:26:49AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:15:33AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > 	PR 1025
> > > > 	* elf-m10300.c (mn10300_elf_check_relocs): Handle indirect
> > > > 	symbol.
> > > [snip]
> > > > --- bfd/elf-m10300.c.got	2005-05-07 06:58:08.000000000 -0700
> > > > +++ bfd/elf-m10300.c	2005-06-20 10:55:33.000000000 -0700
> > > > @@ -717,7 +717,12 @@ mn10300_elf_check_relocs (abfd, info, se
> > > >        if (r_symndx < symtab_hdr->sh_info)
> > > >  	h = NULL;
> > > >        else
> > > > -	h = sym_hashes[r_symndx - symtab_hdr->sh_info];
> > > > +	{
> > > > +	  h = sym_hashes[r_symndx - symtab_hdr->sh_info];
> > > > +	  while (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect
> > > > +		 || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_warning)
> > > > +	    h = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) h->root.u.i.link;
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > >        /* Some relocs require a global offset table.  */
> > > >        if (dynobj == NULL)
> > > [snip]
> > > 
> > > Can you do the indirect sym lookup in elf_link_add_object_symbols
> > > instead?  Seems like elf_link_add_object_symbols already tries to do
> > > this, but I guess doesn't get it right in all cases.
> > > 
> > 
> > The problem is
> > 
> > [hjl@gnu-3 got]$ readelf -s --wide compatibility.o | grep
> > _ZNSi6ignoreEv
> >     83: 00000000   244 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   68 _X_ZNSi6ignoreEv
> >    109: 00000000   244 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   68 _Y_ZNSi6ignoreEv
> >    164: 00000000   244 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT   68 _ZNSi6ignoreEv
> >    188: 00000000   244 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   68 _ZNSi6ignoreEv@GLIBCXX_3.4
> >    214: 00000000   244 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   68 _ZNSi6ignoreEv@@GLIBCXX_3.4.5
> > 
> > and the relocation is against _ZNSi6ignoreEv. elf_link_add_object_symbols
> > doesn't change it to ZNSi6ignoreEv@@GLIBCXX_3.4.5 when it turns
> > _ZNSi6ignoreEv from bfd_link_hash_defweak to bfd_link_hash_indirect.
> > 
> 
> I think it will be very expensive to update all hashes when we turn a
> symbol from bfd_link_hash_defweak to bfd_link_hash_indirect.
> 
> 

We missed this one when an indirect symbol is overridden by aother
one.


H.J.
-----
2005-06-23  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_add_default_symbol): Copy indirect symbol
	when it is overridden by another symbol.

--- bfd/elflink.c.ind	2005-06-22 13:16:26.000000000 -0700
+++ bfd/elflink.c	2005-06-23 07:59:10.596317798 -0700
@@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ _bfd_elf_add_default_symbol (bfd *abfd,
 	      0, name, FALSE, collect, &bh)))
 	return FALSE;
       hi = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) bh;
+      if (hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+	(*bed->elf_backend_copy_indirect_symbol) (bed, h, hi);
     }
   else
     {


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]