This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:34:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
References: <20050705141342.GC26662@systemhalted.org> <20050705162403.GB30316@lucon.org> <20050705172454.GA5314@systemhalted.org> <20050705183022.GA32327@lucon.org> <20050705204437.GC5314@systemhalted.org>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:44:37PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The following:
> http://www.baldric.uwo.ca/~carlos/bug.tar.gz
> 
> Will complain on a bad binutils. 

Does it work with a cross linker?


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]