This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:41AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 02:26:43PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > 	* elf-bfd.h (elf_link_hash_entry): Add the provide field.
> 
> No, you can do without this.  Please think about the problem a little
> before throwing a patch together.  I believe the right solution would be
> to provide section relative init/fini syms before size_dynamic_sections,
> if ref_regular_nonweak && !def_regular.
> 

The final values have to be absulte. How does it support relaxation
when it will be called more then once?


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]