This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 07/07/05, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:57:40AM +0100, Andrew McCall wrote: > > > > This patch should allow binutils-2.15 to allow targets of > > > > ix86-pc-haiku, powerpc-pc-haiku and sparc-pc-haiku to be > > > > > > Using pc as the vendor field on powerpc and sparc sounds wrong. > > > For the latter two, I think one of: > > > powerpc-unknown-haiku > > > powerpc-ibm-haiku > > > powerpc-apple-haiku > > > resp. > > > sparc-unknown-haiku > > > sparc-sun-haiku > > > is appropriate. > > > > I see your point. > > > > Can I clarify - are you suggesting I add all three, or are you > > suggesting that I just add one of them ie. unknown? > > Just one, whichever you prefer. The vendor can be either unknown > in your case, or the (dominant) hardware vendor of the platform. I have had the config.sub patch commited by the maintainer, so I have removed the diff section that changes config.sub, and I have corrected the spelling mistake in the comment I made. What do I have to do now to get this patch committed? The way it currently works you can use --target=powerpc-*-haiku with ibm, pegasos, apple or unknown - do you want me to change the patch to take into account each of the above, or can it just be commited now? I have attached both patches in case people want to test them. -- Thanks, Andrew McCall andrew.mccall@gmail.com
Attachment:
config.sub-haiku.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
binutils-2.15-haiku.patch.v2
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |