This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: problem compiling ia64-gen.c with current tree

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Doug Evans <dje at sebabeach dot org>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:45:04 +0200
Subject: Re: problem compiling ia64-gen.c with current tree
References: <20051014123912.C91E97147@sebabeach.org><434FB6B3.6070009@redhat.com> <434FD191.1070700@sebabeach.org>

Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org> writes:

> Question: To what extent has binutils gone Standard C?
> Can we use inttypes.h here?  I don't care what; for grin's sake cast to 
> uintmax_t and use PRIxMAX?

Binutils source is written in C89/C90, which does not have inttypes.h, but
you can autoconf it.  Note that there is great variance in support for
features of inttypes.h on pre-C99 hosts.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- problem compiling ia64-gen.c with current tree
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: problem compiling ia64-gen.c with current tree
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: problem compiling ia64-gen.c with current tree
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]