This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: make dep-am
- From: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>
- To: "Alan Modra" <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:54:46 -0800
- Subject: RE: make dep-am
I can open a gcc bug report if necessary.
H.J. Lu
Intel Corporation
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Modra [mailto:amodra@bigpond.net.au]
>Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:53 PM
>To: Lu, Hongjiu
>Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
>Subject: Re: make dep-am
>
>On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:32:09PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I saw those too. I am using gcc version 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat
>3.4.4-2)
>> on RHEL 4 U2. I tried gcc version 4.0.3 20051026 (prerelease) and the
>> result is the same.
>
>Hmm, I guess this counts as a minor gcc regression. My old gcc-3.3 is
>clever enough to remove duplicates. It seems that gcc-4.1 generates
>yet
>another set of duplicates too, different from your 3.4 commit. :-(
>
>--
>Alan Modra
>IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre