This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> > Yes; more generally (a) you can define the relevant method directly to > the generic function, no need to wrap it, and (b) might as well call it > from every currently stubbed out implementation of this function and > get them all at once. The attached patch should be better. The only part I wasn't sure about is regarding the stubbed out implementations. How to I find them? 2005-11-16 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> * corefile.c (generic_core_file_matches_executable_p): New function. * libbfd.h (generic_core_file_matches_executable_p): Add declaration. * hpux-core.c: ANSIfy function declarations and prototypes. (thread_section_p): Add comment. (hpux_core_core_file_matches_executable_p): Delete. (hpux_core_vec): Change the matches_executable_p method to use generic_core_file_matches_executable_p. OK to apply? Thanks, -- Joel
Attachment:
core.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |