This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] New option --print-gc-sections


On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:51:19AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> +static void
> +find_offset_in_section (bfd *abfd, asection *section)
> +{
> +  bfd_size_type size;
> +
> +  if (found)
> +    return;
> +
> +  if ((bfd_get_section_flags (abfd, section) & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
> +    return;
> +
> +  size = bfd_get_section_size (section);
> +  if (pc >= size)
> +    return;
> +
> +  found = bfd_find_nearest_line (abfd, section, syms, pc,
> +				 &filename, &functionname, &line);
> +}

It would be better to check that pc is not less than section vma, then
use "off = pc - vma" for size check and bfd_find_nearest_line.  That way
--section lets you specify a section relative offset in an executable.

> @@ -276,12 +314,12 @@ process_file (const char *file_name, con
>    bfd_close (abfd);
>  }
>  
> -int main (int, char **);

Don't delete this.  I believe it is there to quash warnings generated by
some versions of gcc.  OK with these changes.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]