This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, ARM] "Neon-style" VFP syntax for assembler

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: Julian Brown <julian at codesourcery dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:10:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] "Neon-style" VFP syntax for assembler
References: <445B5F51.2090006@codesourcery.com> <446205B1.5080902@codesourcery.com> <44621D63.8080000@redhat.com>

On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:05, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> > Thanks for review! The patch depends (for the testsuite only) on Paul
> > Brook's patch here though:
> >
> >   http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-04/msg00427.html
>
> Do you or Paul have a response to Daniel's comments about that patch ?

It seems a reasonable point. I haven't had time to figure out how feasible it 
is to implement.

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, ARM] "Neon-style" VFP syntax for assembler
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- [PATCH, ARM] "Neon-style" VFP syntax for assembler
  - From: Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH, ARM] "Neon-style" VFP syntax for assembler
  - From: Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH, ARM] "Neon-style" VFP syntax for assembler
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]