This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Should sh-*-* enable 64bit targets?
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:58:55PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> I built the sh-linux cross binutils without my patch:
>
> [hjl@gnu-13 binutils-import-cross]$ ./build-sh-linux/ld/ld-new -V
> GNU ld version 2.17.50 20060524
> Supported emulations:
> shlelf_linux
> shelf_linux
>
> My patch doesn't change it.
Ridiculous. You didn't even build a sh-linux cross on a host that tests
your change!
src/binutils-current/configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-nls --build=i586-linux --host=i586-linux --target=sh-linux
.
.
../opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(sh64-dis.o): In function `sh64_get_contents_type_disasm':
/src/binutils-current/opcodes/sh64-dis.c:463: undefined reference to `sh64_get_contents_type'
/src/binutils-current/opcodes/sh64-dis.c:477: undefined reference to `sh64_get_contents_type'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [objdump] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/alan/build/gas/sh/binutils'
> The question is what the original intention was.
I don't care what the original intent of those SH #ifdef BFD64 tests
were. They are quite useless.
> I don't think "#ifdef BFD64" is just a comment. targmatch.sed will put
> them into targmatch.h:
For the purpose of running config.bfd as a shell script, it is most
definitely just a comment. targmatch.sed only picks out targ_defvec, so
in the case of the SH #ifdef BFD64, it is useless for targmatch.h too.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre