This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: backward/forward compatibility of binutils

From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde at aldan dot algebra dot com>
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:44:22 -0400
Subject: Re: backward/forward compatibility of binutils
References: <200607070250.17161@aldan> <20060707132223.GA21313@nevyn.them.org> <20060707132754.GH22573@lug-owl.de>

On Friday 07 July 2006 09:27, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
= Of course. I didn't mention that it would be a nice thing to have. I'm
= actually opposed to it.

Why not? How hard is it to keep API compatibility (no need for ABI)? Why do 
you insist on every tool bundling its own version?

	-mi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: backward/forward compatibility of binutils
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- RE: backward/forward compatibility of binutils
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- backward/forward compatibility of binutils
  - From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: backward/forward compatibility of binutils
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: backward/forward compatibility of binutils
  - From: Jan-Benedict Glaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]