This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [Patch] MIPS: Clean up gas help text.
- From: Thiemo Seufer <ths at networkno dot de>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:22:50 +0000
- Subject: Re: [Patch] MIPS: Clean up gas help text.
- References: <459605B3.6090105@avtrex.com>
David Daney wrote:
> MIPS gas has redundant help text for the -mno-shared option. This patch
> tries to improve the situation.
>
> Tested with x86_64-linux -> mipsel-linux cross build.
>
> OK to commit?
>
> 2006-12-29 David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
>
> * config/tc-mips.c (md_show_usage): Clean up -mno-shared
> documentation.
>
> David Daney
> Index: config/tc-mips.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/config/tc-mips.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.361
> diff -c -p -r1.361 tc-mips.c
> *** config/tc-mips.c 9 Nov 2006 13:04:39 -0000 1.361
> --- config/tc-mips.c 30 Dec 2006 05:43:49 -0000
> *************** MIPS options:\n\
> *** 14832,14838 ****
> -mfix-vr4130 work around VR4130 mflo/mfhi errata\n\
> -mgp32 use 32-bit GPRs, regardless of the chosen ISA\n\
> -mfp32 use 32-bit FPRs, regardless of the chosen ISA\n\
> - -mno-shared optimize output for executables\n\
> -msym32 assume all symbols have 32-bit values\n\
> -O0 remove unneeded NOPs, do not swap branches\n\
> -O remove unneeded NOPs and swap branches\n\
> --- 14832,14837 ----
> *************** MIPS options:\n\
> *** 14846,14852 ****
> -xgot assume a 32 bit GOT\n\
> -mpdr, -mno-pdr enable/disable creation of .pdr sections\n\
> -mshared, -mno-shared disable/enable .cpload optimization for\n\
> ! non-shared code\n\
> -mabi=ABI create ABI conformant object file for:\n"));
>
> first = 1;
> --- 14845,14851 ----
> -xgot assume a 32 bit GOT\n\
> -mpdr, -mno-pdr enable/disable creation of .pdr sections\n\
> -mshared, -mno-shared disable/enable .cpload optimization for\n\
> ! non position independent (non shared) code\n\
Ok, "position dependent" might sound better than "non position independent",
though.
Thiemo