This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: pmulhrw vs pfmulhrw?

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: "Zuxy Meng" <zuxy dot meng at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:42:09 -0400
Subject: Re: pmulhrw vs pfmulhrw?
References: <f26lej$v3t$1@sea.gmane.org>

Has there been any followup to this question yet?

On 5/13/07, Zuxy Meng <zuxy.meng@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Just found that the 3DNow! instruction pmulhrw is decoded as 'pfmulhrw' in
objdump -d. While it's an 3DNow! instruction, pmulhrw actually is an SIMD
integer instruction and both the AMD official documents and gcc
builtin/intrinsics refer to pmulhrw instead of pfmulhrw. Is this a known
problem?

objdump version is:
GNU objdump 2.17.50 20060824
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License.  This program has absolutely no warranty.

--
Zuxy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pmulhrw vs pfmulhrw?
  - From: Zuxy Meng

References:
- pmulhrw vs pfmulhrw?
  - From: Zuxy Meng

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]