This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> Hi Michael, > >>> That's the only place where something needs to be done (the pointer >>> must >>> still be valid even if the size is zero). >> >> Alright -- that's enough to justify the patch, isn't it? > > Certainly - please apply it. Although you could simplify the second part > of > the patch by just checking to see if count is zero and returning, in the > same > way as you check reloc_size. Done. > That way you do not need to check the return values of both allocs. Well, yes I do -- bfd_malloc can still fail. Checked in as attached.
Attachment:
slurp_reloc.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |