This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] libjava: faster 'make install'
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:45:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libjava: faster 'make install'
- References: <20080309145721.GK6280@ins.uni-bonn.de> <20080316081349.GD6067@ins.uni-bonn.de> <jemyoyhpcm.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Hello Andreas,
* Andreas Schwab wrote on Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:37:13PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > Aside, I noted that some rebuilding rules in Makefile.in files
> > change slighty, like this (from the diff of binutils/Makefile.in):
> > | - echo ' cd $(srcdir) && $(AUTOMAKE) --cygnus '; \
> > | - cd $(srcdir) && $(AUTOMAKE) --cygnus \
> > | + echo ' cd $(srcdir) && $(AUTOMAKE) --foreign '; \
> > | + cd $(srcdir) && $(AUTOMAKE) --foreign \
> > I've used pristine Automake 1.9.6, is there something wrong with
> > that?
>
> That can be considered a bug in automake. There is no real difference
> between the cygnus and foreign option, but you get this difference in
> output depending on whether you run "automake --cygnus" or automake
> grabs it from AUTOAMKE_OPTIONS in the Makefile.am.
Ah ok, thanks. I'm redoing my patch with 'automake --cygnus'.
Still: OK to apply, and do I need to ask for a patch like this?
Thanks,
Ralf