This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Patch bfd/doc/Makefile.am and Interix 64bit target
- From: Jerker Bäck <jerker dot back at telia dot com>
- To: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:11:01 +0200
- Subject: Patch bfd/doc/Makefile.am and Interix 64bit target
Could this be changed?
My compiler doesn't like to have options after the source file.
This patch simply move the source file last in the command.
Some questions:
Is this the preferred way to propose changes in binutils?
Is the patch format OK?
I also would like to add my target to binutils:
x86_64-*-interix*
Is that OK? How to do that in a preferred way?
Is it better to attach a file with changes?
Thanks
Jerker
--------------------------------------------------------
diff -urp src.old/bfd/doc/Makefile.am src/bfd/doc/Makefile.am
--- src.old/bfd/doc/Makefile.am Mon Apr 9 17:36:44 2007
+++ src/bfd/doc/Makefile.am Sun Jan 6 11:03:16 2008
@@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ INCLUDES = -I.. -I$(srcdir)/.. -I$(srcdi
-I$(srcdir)/../../intl -I../../intl
$(MKDOC): $(srcdir)/chew.c
- $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -o chew.$$$$ $(srcdir)/chew.c \
- $(CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) $(LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) $(H_CFLAGS) \
- $(INCLUDES); \
+ $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -o chew.$$$$ $(CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD)
$(LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) \
+ $(H_CFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) $(srcdir)/chew.c; \
$(SHELL) $(srcdir)/../../move-if-change chew.$$$$ $(MKDOC)
chew.o: chew.c
--------------------------------------------------------