This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Add support for MIPS16 PIC
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:24:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for MIPS16 PIC
- References: <87r6ah1q5e.fsf@firetop.home> <20080709124414.GA18628@caradoc.them.org> <87wsjuuc2n.fsf@firetop.home>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 07:50:08PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 05:27:09PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> In contrast, things Just Work if we use odd-valued (i.e. ISA-encoded)
> >> addresses, subtracting 1 from the st_size to compensate. That's the
> >> approach I went for.
> >
> > FYI, this is the only bit I found a little strange in your
> > description. For ARM the marker low bit is considered not part of the
> > symbol address, and so st_size is not adjusted to compensate.
>
> I suppose there are pros and cons both ways. FWIW, I don't mind
> which we go for.
For avoidance of doubt, me either.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery