Re: PATCH v2: add mach-o handling in is32bit

[Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>]

On Nov 14, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:

> On Nov 14, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> > Hi Tristan,
> >
> > > I was about to commit this patch but had a thought just before it:
> > > why not use bfd_arch_bits_per_address instead ?
> >
> > Actually that is a good point.  If you can confirm that it works  
> > for both types of mach-o binary then please go ahead and apply that  
> > variant of the patch instead.
>
> I will commit the following patch within a few days.
> I prefer to keep the ELF specific code as ELF32 can be at least used  
> by ia64.

Oops I forgot to say:

Tested on Darwin using native, mmix and x86_64-mingw targets.

Tristan.