This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [uClinux-dev] why no-mmu cannot support binfmt_aout.c
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable dot org>
- Cc: uClinux development list <uclinux-dev at uclinux dot org>, gcc-help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:15:02 -0500
- Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] why no-mmu cannot support binfmt_aout.c
- References: <3a665c760901260851x4dfcc2beve282e8ba709e94e3@mail.gmail.com> <20090126235125.GC9296@shareable.org> <3a665c760901270902r582c60dfm2668a30c754aaf17@mail.gmail.com> <20090127183339.GA23412@shareable.org> <3a665c760901281016i562c8f6h36e77d72946bc704@mail.gmail.com> <4980EE0E.9040307@snapgear.com> <3a665c760901281600q19a5d0d2n4c4bb321cdbfba6c@mail.gmail.com> <4980F5C8.3040202@snapgear.com> <3a665c760901282207g5e203ef0rfbd51a1c2c9a80a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090129061215.GD19270@shareable.org>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 06:12:15AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> I wouldn't be surprised if the Codesourcery tools (especially
> pre-built libs) are targetting later ARM chips only, since people
> using later ARM chips are probably paying Codesourcery for the work.
Our tools support all (post-V4) ARM processors; I believe that we
package libraries for all processors too nowadays. The defaults may
be fairly modern, though - so as Jamie said, be sure to tell the tools
what you want your code to run on!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery