This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [linker] relaxation question

From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR dot Swami dot Reddy at nsc dot com>
To: "Nick Clifton" <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: "binutils at sources dot redhat dot com" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:33:50 +0530
Subject: Re: [linker] relaxation question
References: <4A6EEB8C.70102@nsc.com> <4A715AB9.2020708@redhat.com> <4A716E3F.1020900@nsc.com> <4A71BBE0.9090604@redhat.com>

Hi Nick,
Thank you. I will look into MN10300 port.

Thanks
Swami

Nick Clifton wrote:

Hi Swami,

Is there any target has adopted the above implementation?
Well the linker relaxation for the MN10300 port is pretty good, so I would recommend taking a look at that. (You may also want to look at the effect of the md_allow_eh_opt variable in the gas/ehopt.c file since you will probably want to set this to 0 for your port).
Cheers
   Nick

References:
- [linker] relaxation question
  - From: M R Swami Reddy
- Re: [linker] relaxation question
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [linker] relaxation question
  - From: M R Swami Reddy
- Re: [linker] relaxation question
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]