This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini<bonzini@gnu.org> wrote: > On 08/18/2009 09:52 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> * H.J. Lu wrote on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:44:50PM CEST: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>>> >>>> * H.J. Lu wrote on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:36:23PM CEST: >>>> >>>> Please see this proposed patch set which will obsolete your patch: >>>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42947/focus=26464> >>>> as part of the move to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11 >>> >>> Does your patch cover libiberty? >> >> Yes. ?My plan is to update all that is contained in the GCC and >> binutils plus gdb trees at once; and look at the other packages >> that have their main home in src about what to do after that; see >> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42947/focus=43065> >> for which directories exactly are in that second list. > > I think he meant that libiberty does not use automake. ?The libiberty patch > looks fine, but is _not_ approved until libiberty has switched to Autoconf > 2.64. ?Please resubmit later. ?The other parts will be obsolete. > > Paolo > Hi, Here is the patch for libiberty. OK for gcc and src? Thanks. -- H.J. --- libiberty/ 2009-08-18 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> PR ld/10536 * Makefile.in (install-html-recursive): Removed.
Attachment:
binutils-install-2.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |